Zakir Naik: Promoting Terrorism?

Oct 16, 2009

Zakir Naik: Promoting Terrorism?

Radical Islamism & Jihad
15 Oct 2009, NewAgeIslam.Com
Zakir Naik: Promoting Terrorism?

In every non-Islamic country the rate of crime among Muslims is much higher than the average population. France has a high rate of crime confined mostly to its Muslim population. In Netherlands the rate of the crime has jumped 11% in just one year and it is exclusively because of Muslims. In an article published in Times, Lahor, April 2001, Khaled Ahmed reported that the crime rate among Pakistanis in UK “is higher than in any other community. Fully 2 percent of the prisoners rotting in British jails are Pakistanis, the highest for any one community.” In Australia raping the white girls by Muslim youths has become a national problem. What are the excuses of these Muslim rapists? That “in Islamic countries girls don’t dress like this!” — Ali Sina

URL of this page: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1914

——-

Zakir Naik: Promoting Terrorism

By Ali Sina

I found the following paragraph in irf.net, the official site of Dr. Zakir Naik. This is what he teaches to his students: “5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist

A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word ‘terrorist’ is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people.”

Dr. Naik claims that the anti-social elements that need to be terrorized by Muslims are the criminals, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. But isn’t it the job of the police to go after the criminals? The police are trained and are paid to catch the criminals. His job is not to terrorize the criminal but to enforce the law. Those whom he catches are not criminals until proven as such in the court of law. As far as the police is concerned they are suspects. He must catch the suspect using minimum force and use force only if necessary. He must respect the human rights of the suspects. As long as the suspect is not convicted in a court of law, he remains innocent.

Who gave the authorization to Muslims to take the place of the police, the court, the executioner and terrorize people whom they accuse of crime? Don’t we have a penal system to deal with these matters? Should citizens take the law in their own hands? This is in itself against the law. What this doctor is ostensibly proposing here is anarchy. We have a whole structure set in place to deal with criminals. Under what law average citizens can assume the role of the entire legal system? This is insanity!

Furthermore, in every non-Islamic country the rate of crime among Muslims is much higher than the average population. France has a high rate of crime confined mostly to its Muslim population. In Netherlands the rate of the crime has jumped 11% in just one year and it is exclusively because of Muslims. In an article published in Times, Lahore, April 2001, Khaled Ahmed reported that the crime rate among Pakistanis in UK “is higher than in any other community. Fully 2 percent of the prisoners rotting in British jails are Pakistanis, the highest for any one community.” In Australia raping the white girls by Muslim youths has become a national problem. What are the excuses of these Muslim rapists? That “in Islamic countries girls don’t dress like this!”

It would be naïf to take Dr. Naik’s justification of terrorism by its face value. What this snake-oil salesman actually means by anti-social elements are the non-Muslims and those who resist conversion. According to him I would be an anti-social element that have to be killed. Have I committed rape, theft or any crime? I and people like me are considered anti social because we speak our minds and Muslims can’t handle that. Are Salman Rushdie and Taslima Nasrin anti-social elements? What about Theo Van Gogh? Was he an anti social element?

After glorifying and justifying terrorism and hyping his students to become terrorists, making them believe this is a divine mandate and a wonderful thing to do, Dr. Naik will then explain to his foolhardy alumni that “shirk is worse than killing” and the unbelievers are worse than thieves, dacoits, rapists and murderers. Therefore it is incumbent upon Muslims, to instill terror in the hearts of non-Muslims and kill them wherever they find them. To determine their innocence or guilt it is enough to ask them whether they want to convert to Islam or not.

Ironically, since according to the Quran, these non-Muslims by rejecting Islam have committed the worst crime imaginable, their property can be stolen and their wives and daughters can be raped. Thus Muslims who joined Dr. Naik’s school to fight the dacoits, BECOME the dacoits, the criminals and the thugs.

URL of this page: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1914

Madrasa reform being opposed in Pakistan too: Fundamentalism, Corruption and Sectarian divisions are responsible

Urdu Section
16 Oct 2009, NewAgeIslam.Com
Madrasa reform being opposed in Pakistan too: Fundamentalism, Corruption and Sectarian divisions are responsible
Presently, the question is not about whether madrasas are encouraging terrorism or not? The question of great concern is why madrasa officials are afraid and not interested in affiliation with a central Board. Some of them are talking about the danger of increasing corruption; in fact, they are afraid of losing their hold of proprietorship, status and authority as they will have to follow a code of conduct and certain terms and conditions. The corruption prevalent in the payment of teachers’ salary and the manner of imparting education will be exposed. The proposal of madrasa board may also expose the dishonesty of our Islamic scholars. This makes the prospect of reform very bleak as the ruling political parties are helpless before them and cannot afford their displeasure and annoyance. — Tahir Khaleel. (Translated from Urdu by Raihan Nezami)

URL: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1928

Madrasa reform being opposed in Pakistan too

Apart from fundamentalism and obscurantism, Corruption and sectarian divisions too are responsible

by Tahir Khaleel

(Translated from Urdu by Raihan Nezami)

It may be simply a co-incidence that, at a time when the formation of Madrasa Education Board and the affiliation of other madrasas to it is being debated in India, the same conflict has erupted between government and madrasa authorities over the issue of registration of madrasas to Madrasa Education Board in Pakistan too. This is basically due to corruption and sectarian differences in Pakistan. Right now, the formation of Madrasa Education Board itself is a great controversial issue in our own country.

To everyone’s surprise, when the government in Delhi called a meeting recently to discuss various points related to the issue of the formation of central madrasa board, another problem raised its head:

Who will be the chairman and from which sect will he be selected?

It is a misfortune that corruption and sectarian divisions have been two major factors responsible for the poor condition of the Muslims of subcontinent. Government intervention is looked at in both countries with suspicion. Though our neighbour is an Islamic democracy, a section of their ulema, too, nurse suspicions about the intention of Pakistan government agencies. It seems as if the journey of our countries’ development halted at a point in the past. Perhaps we are still living in 1857. This feeling is quite painful when I consider it and try to fix its responsibility. The so-called Islamic leaders look self-centred and inclined towards their personal gains and lust for money and avarice.

Read the following analysis by Tahir Khaleel and consider sincerely the truth behind this explosive issue. — Editor, Daily Hindustan Express

The Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Geelani had stated in the national assembly in connection with the recent accusation of corruption that the ministers will have to explain their viewpoint in the parliament. The orders were issued in the previous convention of the cabinet to speed up the work on the Accountability Bill. The importance of transparency in democracy and the effectiveness of accountability were stressed in a workshop held recently in Islamabad organized by the American organization (National Democratic Institute) to develop a democratic culture in different parties.

Various government personnel were caught under charges of corruption when Transparency International issued mind-boggling facts and figures with reference to Pakistan in a survey conducted till the date 17th of June 2009. This report discloses the fact that the percentage of bribery has increased upto 400%. In the year 2006, a sum of one billion dollars was spent due to corruption which has now increased to four billion dollars. The police and power departments have maintained their status quo of first and second positions respectively.

According to the survey report, National Accountability Bureau should be an autonomous body under supreme judicial control. The judiciary was at third position at corruption list in 2006, but it has rectified its position and after the judicial reformation, it presently holds the seventh position in 2009. It is told in the survey report that the departments of police, power, health and land are the most corrupt respectively. The government and army should not interfere in the economic and business activities, but take strict accountability of the government officials owning greater responsibilities.

The international organization for elimination of corruption says, the country cannot be freed from the clutches of corruption in the presence of NRO which has encouraged corruption in all departments. The functioning of the government is being criticised in the media from all corners. The government should take effective steps to eradicate corruption and try to find out the responsible persons for the rise of corruption in order to punish them.

Recently the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expressed her views in an interview to New York Times that the war against terrorism would have yielded better results, had the U.S spent more money on schools and education for girls in Pakistan than on their army. The U.S has already spent seven billion dollars on Pakistan army after 9/11 incident. She further said she had once advised the then president of Pakistan Parwez Musharraf to pay more attention on investment in the educational field; this would have diminished the possibility of extremism in our Youth. She held the Islamic madrasas responsible for the growth of suicide attacks. She thinks if children are provided better opportunities at school, they will not want to go to madrasas.

Recently, the home ministry has investigated ways and means to implement modern and scientific syllabi in madrasas to bring them into mainstream. Some analysts assume that the ancient Islamic institutions which are purveyors of knowledge and learning are encouraging enmity and extremism. According to a recent survey, extremism is not as big a phenomenon as was thought earlier.

It is a fact that majority of extremists who participated in jihad of Kashmir and Afghanistan in 1980’s, were moderately educated. A few suicide bombers were madrasa-educated and belonged to illiterate and deprived families. Some of them were trained in the madrasas situated in the remote areas of Waziristan.

The government intends to implement better employment-producing syllabus that is financially acceptable. For this, they are paying attention over mainly two points to achieve it. First, all the madrasas should be registered. Secondly, they should be upgraded to the national standard. They had introduced Pakistan Madrasa Education Ordinance in 2001, but it could not be passed due to sectarian differences. The organization formed for Madrasa reforms in 2006, too, met the same fate.

The American Secretary of State is absolutely correct in her opinion. The educational enhancement will not only eradicate illiteracy, but it will also improve living standards of people with a chance of minimizing extremism. The educational backwardness is one of the many reasons for population explosion. According to a report, the population of Pakistan has crossed 188 million, which was only 40 million at the time of the formation of Bangladesh. The imbalance between resources and population has given rise to many problems like poverty, unemployment and extremism. At present, Pakistan is the 6th largest country in population. If the present trend of population explosion continues at the same speed, it will attain the 4th position in the world.

Presently, the question is not about whether madrasas are encouraging terrorism or not? The question of great concern is why madrasa officials are afraid and not interested in affiliation with a central Board. Some of them are talking about the danger of increasing corruption; in fact, they are afraid of losing their hold of proprietorship, status and authority as they will have to follow a code of conduct and certain terms and conditions. The corruption prevalent in the payment of teachers’ salary and the manner of imparting education will be exposed. The proposal of madrasa board may also expose the dishonesty of our Islamic scholars. This makes the prospect of reform very bleak as the ruling political parties are helpless before them and cannot afford their displeasure and annoyance.

URL: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1928

NewAgeIslam2MadarsaEducatio.jpg

Haj subsidy is a fact and must go eventually

Islam and the West
16 Oct 2009, NewAgeIslam.Com
Haj subsidy is a fact and must go eventually
NewAgeIslamSyed2Shahabuddin.jpgHaj subsidy is a fact and must go eventually: Haj subsidy was introduced so as to provide a temporary cushion against sudden increase in the Haj fare. The Haj charter fare was fixed first, to the best of my recollection, at Rs.6,000, then raised to Rs.8,000, then to Rs.12,000, where it has remained static for the last two decades or more. — Syed Shahabuddin

Haj subsidy – fact or fiction: if a deeper study of the so-called Haj subsidy is made, it will become apparent that it is simply an eye-wash. Facts which the Ministry of External Affairs is concealing from the public in the name of subsidy are that the national or international carriers by which pilgrims are flown to Jeddah from different Indian cities are chartered ones which the Haj Committee hires. — Maasoom Moradabadi

Haj hijacked: Who exactly pays the Haj subsidy to Air India? Is it the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) or the Ministry of Civil Aviation? What is the exact amount? Does it change annually? These are matters of detail, but irrelevant to the principle that State should not subsidise religious pilgrimage of any kind to any place irrespective of religion. — Omar Khalidi

Haj subsidy: let Ulema spell out its stand: Every Muslim who wants to go for Haj must keep in mind these two Hadith. Further, in the Holy Koran in Sura Imran (Sura 3) verse 97 it is clearly stated that Haj is incumbent on those who can undertake the journey. The words “can undertake” prohibit going to Haj on subsidy assistance, because it is not pilgrim’s lawful earnings, but someone else’s earnings. — Nawab Mohammed Abdul Ali

Photo: Syed Shahabuddin

URL of this page: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1924

Haj subsidy is a fact and must go eventually

Syed Shahabuddin

Mr. Masoom Moradabadi’s article "Haj Subsidy – Fact or Fiction" (MG, 1-15 September, 2002) suffers from a number of ill-founded presumptions and evident inaccuracies.

Firstly, Haj subsidy is the difference between the Haj charter fare charged by the carriers under the agreement with the Haj Committee and the fare collected by the Haj Committee from the pilgrims. If the difference is, say, Rs.32,000 minus Rs.12,000 i.e. Rs.20,000 per pilgrim, for 72,000 pilgrims traveling by the Haj charter managed by the Haj Committee, the total subsidy will come to Rs.20,000 x 72,000 i.e. 144 crores. So it is neither fictitious nor imaginary. Nor does it amount to the Government of India or the Haj Committee hoodwinking the pilgrims. Neither is it eyewash. Neither it is theologically desirable. However, I deliberately keep off the theological argument for its abolition as Pakistan has done. To the best of my knowledge, there is no Muslim country which subsidizes Haj.

Secondly, Haj subsidy is not at all comparable to the cost of bandobast made in India by the Central/State Governments or local administration at the time of fairs like the Kumbh Mela or pilgrimages like the Amarnath Yatra or, for that matter, the annual Urs of Muslim saints like Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti Gharibnawaz at Ajmer. Bandobast is comparable to the massive arrangements made by the Government of Saudi Arabia for the Haj for all pilgrims and the supportive arrangements made by the Government of India like the opening of a permanent Haj Office in the Consulate General of India, Jeddah, the deputation of the Haj Mission during the Haj to expand the Haj Office, the posting of a Medical Mission with the opening of several Haj dispensaries in Mecca and Medina, free distribution of medicines, provision of ambulance services and limited hospitalization facilities; deputation of Khuddamul Hujjaj by the various State Haj Committees and of its own members by the Haj Committee, not to mention the costly, wasteful and purposeless exercise of sending an Official Haj Goodwill Mission. The bandobast includes also the facilities provided by the State and Central Haj Committee for collecting and training pilgrims, arranging internal transportation, monitoring their arrival at and departure from various collecting and exit points in India.

Thirdly, there is no such thing as ‘Haj quota’. It was introduced at the time when the country faced a foreign exchange problem and the quota was fixed keeping in view the foreign exchange outlay set aside for Haj pilgrims. The reality is that for several years practically all those who apply to the Haj Committee have been accepted to proceed for Haj. Perhaps many applied to the Haj Committee because of the subsidy. There is no foreign exchange shortage now and any citizen going abroad, whatever his purpose, is eligible to draw foreign exchange, much more than the maximum allowed to a Haj pilgrim by the Haj Committee in its wisdom.

Fourthly, it is historically wrong to assert that the question of reducing Haj subsidy and ultimately eliminating it has arisen only after the NDA/BJP came to power though the Sangh Parivar’s criticism has become more shrill and sharp. The question of Haj Subsidy was formally raised in the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs in the early ’90’s during Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao’s Government year after year. All parties are represented in the Standing Committee and the recommendation to reduce it and eventually to abolish it was unanimous. What is important for us is to realize that for the benefit of a few, we have served the Sangh Parivar with a ’cause’ on a platter, given them a stick to beat the Muslims with and an argument to their theory that secularism in the Indian context means appeasement or preferential treatment to the minorities! Is this in the long-term interest of the Muslim community?

Fifthly, Haj subsidy indeed began in the early 70’s after the oil crisis which caused recurring losses to the Moghul Line, a subsidiary of the Shipping Corporation of India, which operated a Haj service initially with 4 ships. I recall vividly that the Board of Directors of the Moghul Line toyed with the idea of raising the First Class fare while maintaining the deck class fare more or less, so as to break the cost of the service even on a no-profit, no loss basis. In the meantime, a worldwide trend arose to reduce passenger shipping because of the non-availability of new passenger ships.

Ship building yards were constructing few ships, that too of the luxury class for tourists. Thus the Moghul Line was not in a position to replace its aging vessels. More and more Haj traffic from all over the world, except from the Sudan or Somalia across the Red Sea, for the same reason has shifted to air. Today almost entire Haj traffic is by air. Therefore, those who argue that the Government of India or the Haj Committee should acquire passenger ships are obviously ignorant of the world shipping situation or that the sea fare would exceed the air fare, apart from adding to the overall cost of the Haj due to longer travel time and longer stay in Saudi Arabia. Haj transportation from India by air had begun in the 60’s itself. But as it grew, it faced the oil crisis in the early 70’s when the carriers raised airfare due to inordinate rise in the cost of aviation fuel.

Haj subsidy was introduced so as to provide a temporary cushion against sudden increase in the Haj fare. The Haj charter fare was fixed first, to the best of my recollection, at Rs.6,000, then raised to Rs.8,000, then to Rs.12,000, where it has remained static for the last two decades or more.

To the extent the Haj fare increases because of rise in the IATA return fare, say, Delhi-Jeddah-Delhi, in US Dollars and the change in the rate of exchange between the Dollar and the Rupee, there is nothing that the Government of India or the Haj Committee can do. For example, if the IATA fare increases from $400 to $600 and the exchange rate from Rs.10 to Rs.50 per dollar, it will mean a natural increase of $200 X 40 = Rs.8,000. This the Haj pilgrim should pay in good conscience, just as he pays higher accommodation charges in Mecca and Medina and Mina-Arafat, the higher cost of bread and other essentials he buys in Saudi Arabia and even higher fixed charges for Haj movement payable to the Saudi Arabian authorities because of the corresponding rise in the exchange rate of the Saudi Riyals which is linked to dollar at $1.00 = SR 3.75. However, Mr. Moradabadi has a point – which I have myself been arguing for years upon the Government of India, both the Ministry of Civil Aviation and the Ministry of External Affairs: there is no reason for the Haj charter fare, whosoever be the carrier, to exceed 2/3 of the normal IATA fare. I say 2/3, not ½ because one has to make allowance of 2 vacant runs of the aircraft from Jeddah to Delhi during the outward movement and from Delhi to Jeddah during the inward movement. Indeed, during my time as Joint Secretary (Haj) in the Ministry of External Affairs and as

Member/Vice-Chairman of the Haj Committee, I had endeavoured to keep it more or less at that level. Unfortunately it went totally out of control during the late 90’s and the charter fare as a proportion of the IATA fare began rising. Now the Charter fare exceeds the IATA fare by 10%. The inability or the unwillingness of the Haj Committee, the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Civil Aviation to lower the Charter fare is the real problem.

I do not understand why the Government is unwilling to examine closely the cause of the inordinate rise in the charter fare as a proportion of the current IATA fare. This is a mystery I cannot unravel. But I have my doubts about the integrity and the efficiency of the negotiating team and the decision makers. This doubt is further enhanced because of adhoc procedures being adopted for selecting the carrier and fixing the Charter fare. Surely some people are profiting at the expense of the Government and the pilgrims and the Muslims are serving as the scapegoat.

Assuming Rs.32,000 to be the Haj Charter fare and 72,000 pilgrims, the total transaction comes to Rs.230.4 crores. We know that in our country every transaction generates a Commission, an under-the-table payment. 5% will amount to more than 11.5 crores! That there is corruption goes without saying but one does not know how far up the money travels. If the Government wish to convince the Muslim community about the need to pay higher Haj charter fare, the process of charter arrangement must become transparent. The statutory responsibility for making arrangement for the transportation of the pilgrims vests in the Haj Committee. It is for the Haj Committee to float the international tender and to enter into negotiations with the interested carriers (including Air India or India Airlines) which respond and make a bid. The Haj Committee has the necessary expertise by now, to work out its essential requirements for the tender. To examine the bids and to negotiate with the shortlisted bidders, It should form a 5-man Negotiating Team with the Chairman and one more member, preferably one of the Vice-Chairmen, a representative each of the Ministries of External Affairs, Civil Aviation and Finance at the level of Joint Secretary. Air India which has an obvious conflict of interest should not, repeat NOT, be represented on the Team. The Ministry of Civil Aviation should, however, direct the Airport Authority of India to offer best possible terms for ground facilities for the outward and inward flights and the Directorate of Civil Aviation to check and certify the airworthiness of the aircrafts offered by the carrier. It goes without saying that the terms of the Charter will be subject to final approval by the Government.

The Haj Committee should, through the Embassy of India, Riyadh and the Consulate General of India, Jeddah, find out in advance from the Saudi Arabian Airlines whether it wishes to participate in the transportation arrangement and if so, whether it will accept the terms offered by the Haj Committee to which the other carrier agrees. In case the Haj Committee selects a carrier other than Air India, the Ministry of Civil Aviation should issue a directive to Air India to comply with the requisite formalities as the national carrier. Presently, even the formation of the Negotiating Team is kept secret; its composition is a top secret; the final terms agreed to are never released for public scrutiny.

The mode of payment of the subsidy, to the Haj Committee or directly to the carrier, by the Ministry of External Affairs or by the Ministry of Civil Aviation or through Air India is also not in the public domain. Why all this secrecy? What is urgently needed is a White Paper on Haj Subsidy giving year-wise IATA fare, the prevailing exchange rate, the name of the carrier, Haj charter fare payable to the carrier, the fare collected from the pilgrim, the subsidy per pilgrim and the total amount. The White Paper should also give the names of the then Chairman, Haj Committee, the then Minister of Civil Aviation and the then Chairman/Managing Director of Air India. If the Haj charter fare is brought down to 2/3 of the IATA fare and the pilgrim is asked to pay the natural increase on Rs.12,000 since it was first fixed, the Government can well pay the difference, without much political repercussion. Or the pilgrim may well refuse the subsidy because it shall be an insignificant amount as compared to the total cost of Haj! More pilgrims may then take to normal commercial flights and perform Haj through the Haj Tour Operators, if indeed they offer better terms than the Haj Committee as Mr. Moradabadi has stated. The Government, however, need to regulate the Haj Tour Operators in the interest of the pilgrims.

Source: http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/15092002/1509200242.htm

Haj subsidy – fact or fiction

By Maasoom Moradabadi

NewAgeIslamMaasoom1Moradaba.jpgThe government has decided to gradually do away with the subsidy granted to those intending to go for Haj pilgrimage by air. Grounds are very subtly being prepared for this purpose. When the decision is finally taken, the Haj fare will go up from Rs 12,000 (at present) to Rs 36,000/. Government claims that it spends an amount of Rs 150 crores every year on subsidy to Haj pilgrims. However, if ground realities are considered in this connection, a fictitious aspect of this ‘benevolence’ will become apparent.

Has the government so far been hoodwinking Muslims in matter of Haj subsidy? Is the government’s granting subsidy on air journey, which is so widely publicised and propagated, doing any favour on them? We shall review this later in this article but first let us examine the steps that are proposed to be taken by the government in doing away with this subsidy.

Communalists have always been taunting Muslims that they perform Haj on account of subsidy being granted by the government. Fascist organisations like VHP and Bajrang Dal have repeatedly been demanding that Haj subsidy should be abolished. These organisations have become even more vocal in their demand ever since NDA government led by BJP has come to power at the Centre. Succumbing to their ever increasing demand and pressure the government has finally decided to abolish this subsidy for good within the next two years.

Action for gradual abolition of subsidy is being initiated from this year itself. It is expected that soon announcement will be made to deprive those prospective pilgrims of this concession who pay income tax and also those who want to go for Haj for the second or third time. Moreover, government intends to cut down the annual quota of Haj pilgrims from the present 72,000 to 50,000. This clearly implies that the pilgrims who have so far been paying Rs 12,000/= for air journey will now have to pay three times more and that they will be deprived of all other facilities and concessions which they had been getting in this connection.

Government has not so far clarified whether it will be abolishing the subsidy only for Haj pilgrims or it intends to reduce or do away with the subsidy or concessions to pilgrims for Kumbh Fair or such other religious pilgrimages. It may be stated in this connection that the central government grants a subsidy of Rs 1200 crores for every Kumbh Fair at Allahabad and necessary arrangements in this connection. This amount does not include crores of rupees incurred by the government on other major or minor programmes and religious functions.

Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Omar Abdullah, who is also looking after the Haj related matters recently announced in the Haj Conference held in Srinagar that the government is trying to gradually do away with the Haj subsidy because a discussion is going on among Muslims on the question of subsidy whereas the Qur’an clearly states in this connection that this (Haj) is incumbent on those who have the capacity to perform it.

He also said in the Haj Conference that ‘We may possibly do this (abolition of subsidy) from the year 2004’. On this occasion chief minister Farooq Abdullah said that unless Muslims do not learn to depend upon themselves, organisations like RSS will continue to degrade and taunt them. He supported the idea of abolition of subsidy and proposed many steps for bringing about reform in the Haj arrangements.

Achievements of Haj Committee

So far as subsidies on air travels of Haj pilgrims are concerned, some fundamental problems must be taken into account. Ministry of External Affairs, Govt of India had started Haj subsidy for journey by ship which is now stopped. Now more than one lakh pilgrims from India go for Haj by air. Out of this, around 72,000 pilgrims go through Haj Committee and the rest go through private tour operators. Arrangements made by the Haj Committee for prospective Hajis are always butt of criticism and on many occasions serious allegations on account of mismanagement and corruption have been made against the Haj Committee. Hajis have never expressed satisfaction over the arrangements and facilities made for them by the Haj Committee or the Ministry of External Affair during the flight or during the period of their stay at Makka and Madina. As regards the arrangements made for their boarding and lodging, there have always been complaints.

On the whole, the performance and arrangements made by the Haj Committee cannot be described as satisfactory. The present Haj Committee is headed by a member of BJP’s national executive committee, Tanvir Ahmad who is basically a political person. Ever since he has taken over the reins of the Haj Committee, some leaders of BJP and organisations like RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal etc have become much more vocal in their demand for abolition of Haj subsidy, but whenever questions were put to them about their demand and to clarify their stand, they kept mum. However, the steps likely to be taken by the government to abolish subsidy can be judged from the following:

Steps to end subsidy

Parliament’s Standing Committee on Transport and Tourism has recently recommended that the subsidy given to Haj pilgrims on air travel should be reduced and later on abolished completely.

Expenditure Reforms Commission of Government of India too has recommended in its 10th report submitted in September 2001 that steps should be taken to end subsidy on charter flights for Haj and also to reduce the quota of Hajis.

Central cabinet has asked the ministry of civil aviation to submit to it a policy paper together with its proposals for reducing the number of Hajis and also the subsidy.

In reply to a question in Rajya Sabha in March this year government assured that the proposal to end subsidy in the next few years is under consideration.

According to M. Afzal, secretary in the minority cell of Congress, NDA government under BJP’s leadership has very cleverly and subtly taken several steps during the past two years or so to end subsidy.

Meeting of Muslim MPs

Union minister for civil aviation, Shah Nawaz Husain had called a meeting of Muslims MPs to consider the problems of ending Haj subsidy gradually and also to reduce the annual quota of Hajis. He tried to give the impression that BJP government is the biggest sympathiser and well-wisher of Muslims but the arguments and data presented by him in this connection exposed his political compulsions and immaturity. However, nothing could be decided unanimously about gradual abolition of subsidy. As regards the increase in fare, it is reliably learnt that an increase of Rs 4000, i.e., from Rs 12,000 to Rs 16,000, was favoured because there was no revision in the fare ever since 1994. Those who attended this meeting included, among others, PM Sayeed, C.K. Jafar Sharief, G.M. Banatwala, Saleem Sherwani etc.

The problem of granting Haj subsidy to pilgrims of 50 years and above and to reduce annual quota from 72,000 to 50,000 came up for discussion in this meeting but nothing was finally decided. In any case, subsidy will be reduced. This proposal is in fact nothing new. Government has been considering this problem for more than a year. Proposal to this effect is expected to be submitted to the Union cabinet for implementation from this year itself.

Government’s decision to gradually do away with the subsidy is based on the recommendations of 10th Expenditure Reforms Commission which recommended that the number of beneficiaries of subsidy should be reduced and should be frozen at the current level. Similarly, subsidy on charter fare also should be frozen at the current level.

Haj Subsidy: An eye-wash

If a deeper study of the so-called Haj subsidy is made, it will become apparent that it is simply an eye-wash. Facts which the Ministry of External Affairs is concealing from the public in the name of subsidy are that the national or international carriers by which pilgrims are flown to Jeddah from different Indian cities are chartered ones which the Haj Committee hires.

According to air travel rules, if a person travels in his individual capacity, he has to pay full fair but for group travel, fares are considerably reduced. If the entire plane is hired on charter, fares are reduced to even less than half.

The fundamental question is: when the pilgrims are taken to Saudi Arabia by chartered flights where is the question of subsidy? The per head fare will even otherwise be half or less than that, subsidy or no subsidy.

The other day government was blamed for paying huge amounts to Air India in order to make up its losses on account of subsidy but in the light of above facts it is nothing but a ruse to befool Muslims and also to give the communalists a tool to defame and taunt Muslims. What is needed is that a high level enquiry should be made to investigate all these tall talks of subsidy to Haj pilgrims and to which head this ‘subsidy’ is apportioned. q

Source: http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/01092002/0109200276.htm

Haj hijacked

By OMAR KHALIDI

India is among the top 10 countries sending most Hajis. Until early 1960s when Bombay was connected to Jeddah by air, most pilgrims went by boats run by Mogul Line Ltd., a British-controlled company. In 1975, the Shipping Corporation of India, a government undertaking, took over Mogul Line. The oil crisis of the early 1970s made the cost of sea fare higher than air fare, so the ships were abandoned. Instead, the GOI gave Air India monopoly over Haj travel in 1975. The oil crisis further escalated the cost of air fare forcing the government to introduce “Haj subsidy” to Air India, not to the individual, pious pilgrim.

Deregulating Haj

Who exactly pays the Haj subsidy to Air India? Is it the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) or the Ministry of Civil Aviation? What is the exact amount? Does it change annually? These are matters of detail, but irrelevant to the principle that State should not subsidise religious pilgrimage of any kind to any place irrespective of religion.

In this particular case, the canard that the State is paying Muslims to perform Haj has done immense damage to an already demonised community. A senior Muslim leader like Syed Shahabuddin and the young Lok Sabha member from Hyderabad, Asaduddin Owaisi, have both expressed the will of the community to terminate the subsidy. The impediment to Haj subsidy abolition lies squarely with Air India, a state corporation. The Government of India, through the Central Haj Committee, should invite biddings from various airlines in India for Haj group travel and designate the lowest bidder as the official carrier of the Haj passengers.

The second matter in which the GOI is involved in Muslim pilgrimage is the Haj Goodwill Delegation. It originated in the aftermath of 1965 war with Pakistan. During the Haj, Pakistani diplomats and officials used the occasion of the international Muslim gathering to present their perspective on the Kashmir conflict. The MEA decided to counter the Pakistani version of the conflict by sending a Haj Goodwill Delegation to Mecca, obviously at state expense. Since its inception in 1966, it is led by a union minister who meets his Saudi counterpart and others.

No goodwill generated

The delegation consisted of five members. Now its numbers have shot up to 70, including spouses of the delegates. The corridors of power, the chambers of ministers and the houses of MPs in New Delhi are filled with aspirants to Haj delegation. The aspirants are mostly self-seeking politicians, unemployed, unemployable maulanas and maulavis seeking a free ride at the tax-payers’ expense. This year, the Centre has budgeted as much as Rs. 6 crores for the delegation’s cost of travel, accommodation, and incidental expenses. The official Haj delegation strains the resources of the Indian Consulate General in Jeddah, whose primary duty during the Haj is to look after the well-being of pilgrims. Instead, they are compelled to tend to the whims of the rich and powerful politicians masquerading as Muslim leaders. It is time to abolish the Haj goodwill delegation. There must be more imaginative ways of accomplishing the original purpose– countering Pakistani versions of the Kashmir conflict. The delegations are not earning the goodwill of Indian Muslims.

Source: http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/op/2009/10/04/stories/2009100450031200.htm

Haj subsidy: let Ulema spell out its stand

NAWAB MOHAMMED ABDUL ALI

‘Haj hijacked,’ by Omar Khalidi, (The Hindu, Open Page, October 4, 2009) was meaningful, interesting and informative. On several occasions I have raised my voice against subsidy for the Haj.

From a religious point of view, let me quote two Hadith (authentic sayings of the Holy Prophet, PBUH) from the book Haj, Umrah and Ziarath, by an eminent Islamic scholar from Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdul Aziz Bin Abdullah Bin Baz:

“One should arrange for his expenses of Haj and Umrah out of his or dependent progeny lawful earnings, as commanded by the Holy Prophet (PBUH)”, “Allah is pure and He accepts only what is pure” (page 14).

“A pilgrim should avoid the earnings of others and not seek others monetary help” (page 23).

Every Muslim who wants to go for Haj must keep in mind these two Hadith. Further, in the Holy Koran in Sura Imran (Sura 3) verse 97 it is clearly stated that Haj is incumbent on those who can undertake the journey. The words “can undertake” prohibit going to Haj on subsidy assistance, because it is not pilgrim’s lawful earnings, but someone else’s earnings.

The question is: “Is it morally and ethically correct to undertake Haj pilgrimage on subsidy?” Let the learned Ulema, Islamic scholars and Muslim intellectuals clarify whether performing Haj by availing of the subsidy is permissible or not under Shariat (Islamic Law).I am writing this with the utmost respect to every individual Muslim, and it is not my intention to embarrass anybody embarking on Haj pilgrimage, at any level. It is disturbing to religious beliefs, and should be corrected by the Ulema by issuing the right fatwa in the light of the Holy Koran and Hadith. No country in the world, including Muslim countries, perhaps offers Haj subsidy.

Even the High Court of Lahore in a 1997 judgment said it is un-Islamic to avail of subsidy and perform Haj. I am sure the authorities concerned will agree that spending about Rs. 400 crore (which may go up in future) for 0.06 per cent of Muslim population is justifiable.

The Government has to devise some other alternative if it really wants to help Muslims, and let the subsidy amount be used for constructive and meaningful welfare measures for the community.

One of the senior Indian politicians recently asked me what was wrong in offering Haj subsidy? The question is not what is wrong but whether it is right.

(The writer is Prince of Arcot.)

Source: http://www.hindu.com/op/2009/10/11/stories/2009101153651200.htm

URL of this page: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1924

MIAMI: Why women choose the hijab

Islam, Women and Feminism
16 Oct 2009, NewAgeIslam.Com
MIAMI: Why women choose the hijab
NewAgeIslamHijab2Women.jpgWomen Never Forced to Wear ‘Niqab’: Grand Mufti of Dubai

Burka should be woman’s choice

Lucknow, India: Muslim Women Workout At Gyms

Indian Muslim women for empowerment

Lucknow: More women in Muslim body sparks row

Azerbaijan gave voting right to women in 1918: conference

Malaysian women: Islam, secularism, ethnicity debates continue

Afghan Women’s Freedom In Jeopardy

URL: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1926

Why women choose the hijab

Oct 15, 2009

MIAMI: Growing up in Davie, Fla., Sahar Ullah remembers the awkward interactions, confused looks and frequent questions about her hijab, the head cover she chooses to wear, and her religion, Islam.

There was the boy in high school who would playfully jostle her between classes before realizing that she avoided touching nonrelated males as a matter of Islamic modesty.

There was the University of Miami staffer who, expecting drunk students at his building’s door during a football game, was perplexed to instead find Ullah and a friend looking for a place to pray.

And there was a Catholic friend who did graduate work in Middle Eastern Studies with her at the University of Chicago and asked the common question: "Why do you wear it?"

"After listening to yet another one of my stories about life as a Muslim-American who wears the hijab, he said, ‘You know what? We need hijabi monologues,’" says Ullah, 26.

"Hijabi Monologues," a three-woman production, describes the experiences of young Muslim women who wear the veil. Ullah staged the hourlong show, which takes its name and attitude from Eve Ensler’s "Vagina Monologues," three years ago in Chicago. It’s also shown in Los Angeles and Washington.

In 11 monologues based on stories Ullah has heard through acquaintances as well as a few pulled from her own life, the women on stage share experiences that range from comic to sober.

One is about the type of men who hit on hijabis — slang for women who wear the hijab. Another is about a teenager whose father is arrested on charges of terrorism. A story that often gets a response is about a Muslim teenager who gets pregnant, a taboo topic in many Muslim communities.

"Where Ensler takes something private and personifies it by giving it a voice and puts it in your figurative faces," Ullah says, "we’ve decided to take something public, something which everyone seems to have an opinion about, and push it out of your figurative faces by giving the entire woman a voice."

Ullah, who recently returned to South Florida after two years of Arabic study at the American University in Cairo, is working full time to take "Hijabi Monologues" on a national tour, which includes a November show at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington.

For each performance, she involves local Muslims, such as South Florida performer Jamarah Amani.

"When I read the script, it came to life for me. I said, ‘Oh yeah, I’ve seen this happen to me,’" says Amani, 29, a midwifery student at the Miami Maternity Center.

"Being Muslim is not about what you externally represent, but that’s how people superficially reduce it. The beauty of this show is that it represents so many different voices and backgrounds."

"Hijabi Monologues," a small production organized largely by Ullah, has an extended cast that’s growing, much like its popularity in Muslim circles. The show is being organized along with a monologue-writing workshop at the University of Miami, as well as a service day for Project Downtown, a Muslim-organized effort that distributes food, toiletries and clothing to the homeless.

For May Alhassen, a Syrian-American who first attended the show in her hometown of Los Angeles a year ago and now flies around the country to perform in it, the show is about exposing non-Muslims to Muslim experiences and "confronting the fact that I have had my own Muslim-American stereotypes that I carry."

"We hope that the non-Muslim audience can see a common human bond in the stories and can start to question what they see around them," says Alhassen, 27, an American studies doctoral candidate at the University of California, Los Angeles.

http://www.newsobserver.com/life/story/141421.html

Women Never Forced to Wear ‘Niqab’: Grand Mufti of Dubai

Ahmed Shaaban, 13 October 2009

DUBAI — The Grand Mufti of Dubai has refuted allegations made by some quarters that ‘niqab’ is linked?to extremism.

“Niqab is never related to fanaticism or terrorism as some have wickedly alleged,” Dr Ahmed Al Haddad told Khaleej Times in an exclusive meeting ?on Sunday.

He said that banning or seeking a ban on ‘niqab’ restricts women’s freedom.

“Muslim women have never been forced to wear ‘niqab’,” he pointed out.

He added that some of the Muslim women wear ‘niqab’ out of faith, but forcing them to abandon the ‘niqab’ would be “utter disrespect to her and to her creed, culture and traditions.”

Dr Al Haddad said the ‘niqab’ is also a symbol of modesty for the Muslim woman. A Canadian Muslim organisation had urged the Canadian government on Thursday to ban the ‘niqab’, claiming it was a “medieval and misogynist symbol of extremism.”

The same day, Dr Shaikh Mohammed Saeed Tantawi, head of Egypt’s Al Azhar University, a centre of religious learning, said the institution will bar students and teachers from wearing ‘niqab’ in female-only classrooms.

A university statement, quoted in reports, said the institution did not oppose the veil, but was against “imprinting it on the minds of girls.”

The statement said only a few Islamic scholars consider it an obligation.

Al Haddad said various Islamic scholars referred to different parts of the Holy Quran to interpret as to what extent Muslim women should cover their faces and whether the ‘niqab’ should be worn. While Shafiei and Hanbali schools of thought believe the veil is compulsory, Maliki and Hanafi do not think so. “Both parties, having authentic and meaningful evidence, make the issue optional, that the followers of each school may not ask or force the other to adopt or abandon any of the two explanations.”

Refuting allegations that the ‘niqab’ is connected to slavery or discrimination against women, Dr Al Haddad said Islam has honoured women and fully emancipated them.

“The woman, representing half of the society, stands on an equal footing with man in terms of religious, financial, social, political and family rights and duties. She is seen as a gem protected against any disgrace, and ‘niqab’ is Islam’s fundamental means to that end,” he said.

“Despite wearing ‘niqab’, she is effectively working in educational, health, military and civil fields in Islamic and Arab countries, particularly in ?the Gulf.”

Iraqi news anchor Suhad Ibrahim believes that people are free to wear whatever they think is suitable for them.

“Though I am not veiled, I am against any ban on ‘niqab’. I believe it is up to the people to decide what to wear,” ?she said.

Egyptian teacher Walla Nader said she felt better after wearing ‘niqab’. “No one has ever forced me to wear ‘niqab’ as it is optional in Islam,” she pointed out.

ahmedshaaban

Source: http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle08.asp?xfile=data/theuae/2009/October/theuae_October269.xml&section=theuae

—-

Burka should be woman’s choice

Thu Oct 15 2009

Re:Muslim lobby group urges

Ottawa to ban burkas, niqabs, Oct. 7

Canadians, being known for our diversity, should know by now that the burka – which is different from the hijab – is not a symbol of Islam but of the Arabic culture. Islam does not force women to wear the burka. Clearly, it’s a choice that lies with women and women alone.

The Muslim Canadian Congress had no right to call the burka "medieval" and "misogynist" because it’s a part of someone’s culture, of someone’s identity. Women choose to wear the burka to cover themselves. Why should that be banned?

If wearing the burka is a part of the Arabic culture, then Arabs, or others, should not be stopped from wearing it. Women want to wear it because it’s a part of who they are and no one has the right to take it away from them.

And I fail to see how the burka promotes gender inequality when the burka ban in France led to women, not men, protesting.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/710391

Muslim Women Workout At Gyms In Lucknow, India

October 12, 2009

Not compromising with their faith, Muslim women workout in gyms wearing veils in Lucknow, say reports.

The desire to remain fit and healthy is driving these Muslim women to workout at gyms.

"We come here in veil so that nobody objects our coming to the gym. Basically, we want to keep ourselves fit and healthy, that’s our main motive. We want to move ahead like others in this modern age," said Shakila Anam, a woman.

Anwar Hasan, a fitness trainer expresses happiness on seeing health conscious Muslim women moving ahead in life.

"In Islam women do wear veils. It is nice to see women moving ahead in our religion," said Anwar Hasan, a health trainer.

A Muslim cleric, Mulana S. Hasan Raza Zaidi, also supports women going to gyms to keep themselves fit and healthy provided they go in ‘burkha’.

"Nobody should have any objection to it. Islam doesn’t oppose it, if women are going to gyms wearing a veil. Islam allows things that are done to keep oneself fit and healthy," said Zaidi,

According to Islamic faith, a veil and an abaya must be worn by a Muslim woman to cover her body.

Source: http://www.medindia.net/news/Muslim-Women-Workout-At-Gyms-In-Lucknow-India-59296-1.htm

—-

Bhartiya Muslim women for empowerment

October 12th, 2009

Favouring women in India, with more empowerments and their wider role in nation building the Muslim women have also initiated their secular way of reaching to the Government of India and to their society to enter ambit of their empowerment in big way.

Conventions,seminars and regular meets are held by the NGO’s, educated women to cultivating more awareness for higher education,play a higher role in growth of the family,society and community.

Muslim community are well aware if the fact that the education to girl and her rights are more important in the rapid changing globe in which the economical freedom do play an important role for the society to progress in holistic way.

Zakia Sonam speaking to Nksagar outside Anhad seminar in New Delhi said Muslims youth with lack of education,poverty in the community a reason for the poor and uneducated muslims becoming sacrifical goats and to be soft target. She said on economic exclusion NGO too need to underatke educations of Muslim youth by opening insitutions exclusively for youths specially girls education.

On the occasion of third national convention of the “Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan” held in state capital Lucknow on Sunday resolved,

The equal rights,

To have right to education,

To have right to jobs,

The right to personal safety,

The right to security,

The right to proper health care, immediate stop of harassment from the police.

Most of the sepaker at the at the convention asked the government just one question in one voice, “When will we become full citizens?”

BMMA Movement believes that solution of these problems is in creating a society where there is social, economic and political justice, establishment of human rights, equality and peace.

Source: http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/uncategorized/bhartiya-muslim-women-for-empowerment_100259540.html

—-

More women in Muslim body sparks row

Deepak Gidwani, October 15, 2009

Lucknow: Mention reserving seats for women in any organisation and it is sure to stir up a controversy. A proposal for reserving 30% of seats for women in the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), put forth by vice-president Maulana Kalbe Sadiq, has earned the renowned Shia cleric bouquets and brickbats.

Lamenting the poor presence of women in the AIMPLB, Kalbe had recently said that reserving 30% membership was "the only option left" to ensure that women got their due in modern society. At present, of the 251 AIMPLB members, only 25 are women.

Muslim women activists have hailed his proposal while some senior clerics have described the move as "impractical" and "meaningless". Lucknow’s Naib Imam and AIMPLB member Maulana Khalid Rashid Firangi Mahali said the proposal is against Islamic tradition. He also claimed it would be virtually impossible to find Muslim women qualified to handle the responsibility. "The Maulana (Kalbe Sadiq) seems to be raising such unimportant issues only for publicity in the media," he said.

Another board member Zafaryab Jilani said it would have been more appropriate if Kalbe had raised the matter at an AIMPLB meeting. "Increasing the number of women will not help the cause of Muslim women… numerical strength in the board itself can’t ensure better status for them in so0ciety," he said and added that very few of the current women members turn up for the board’s meetings.

However, the Shia cleric has found support among Muslim women activists. Naish Hasan, founder-member of the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA), said, "Those ridiculing the importance of numerical strength should remember that in a democracy, it is the numbers game which makes and breaks governments and ensures victory of members of parliament and the legislative assemblies."

Shaista Amber, who had formed the All India Women’s Personal Law Board to seek greater representation for women in the AIMPLB, said Kalbe’s proposal was a good start.

Source: http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_more-women-in-muslim-body-sparks-row_1299078

International conference “Woman in Islamic world: traditional values and modernism” takes place

14 Oct 2009

Baku. Kamala Guliyeva – APA. State Committee for Family, Women and Children’s Problems organized an international conference “Woman in Islamic world: traditional values and modernism” within the framework of “Baku – Capital of Islamic Culture – 2009”, APA reports. The letter of president of Heydar Aliyev Foundation Mehriban Aliyeva was read at the conference. Following this, chairperson of the state committee Hijran Huseynova said the aim of the conference is discuss the development of the international cooperation by using the practice of foreign countries in the field of women’s rights in Islamic world.

“Alongside with the achievements, there are a number of problems in ensuring women’s rights in the entire world, including Azerbaijan. Therefore, Islamic women need extend their relations and exchange experience,” he said.

Huseynova mentioned that Azerbaijan gave voting right to women in 1918, earlier than some Western states and for the first time in the East. Woman policy is one of the priorities of the state in Azerbaijan,” she said.

Chairman of the State Committee for Religious Organizations Hidayat Orujov said the role of mothers and women is highly appreciated in Islam.

“Islam recognizes all rights of women in economic sphere. Mother and father are equally responsible for children in Islam,” he said.

According to Orujov, freedom of religion has been fully ensured in Azerbaijan and expedient policy is pursued to regulate state-religion relations.

South Caucasus Director of the UN Population Fund Peer Sieben said though Islam gives equal rights to women and men, women have property and political rights, in a number of countries these rights are restricted.

“There are countries that do not recognize these laws. Our task is to raise awareness in such societies concerning the international conventions and Islam legislation,” he said.

Source: http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=109287

Malaysia’s Islam, secularism, ethnicity debates continue: Umno reforms meet inertia

By Shanon Shah

shanonshah

Khairy, Rosnah and Shahrizat (Rosnah pic courtesy of Merdeka Review)

THE 60th Umno general assembly has been touted as one in which the biggest political party in Malaysia will set much-needed reforms in motion. But if the party’s Youth, Wanita and Puteri wings’ assemblies on 14 Oct 2009 are any indication, it looks as though the party will have to wade through institutional and historical inertia before changes can even be attempted.

Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin’s speech was much-anticipated, being his first since he was elected the wing’s head in March 2009. Khairy did not disappoint. After starting with the requisite praises of leaders past and present, Khairy moved on to the obligatory opposition-bashing.

But to Khairy’s credit, his attacks on the Pakatan Rakyat were quite measured. When he accused PAS of subjugating itself to DAP, he stayed clear of challenging PAS to introduce more Islamic laws. He merely said that for a party that previously espoused setting up an Islamic state as its primary goal, PAS was uncharacteristically eager to change its tune at the prospect of grasping federal power.

Similarly, his attacks on DAP steered clear of accusing the secular party of being anti-Islam and anti-Malay Malaysian. He merely said that for a self-proclaimed multi-racial party, DAP seems overrun by only one particular race of Malaysians.

And credit to Khairy, his attacks on PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim steered clear of degrading and insulting comments about Anwar’s alleged homosexuality. But as restrained as he was, Khairy couldn’t stop the Youth delegates from throwing in their two cents about Anwar’s alleged sexual preferences.

Khairy (file pic)

Therefore, it was a stunning moment when Khairy cut short his rabble-rousing to get to the heart of his address: Umno, he said, had to ditch Malay dominance. Kepimpinan Melayu must replace ketuanan Melayu. So revolutionary was Khairy’s vision in the realm of modern Umno discourse that the delegates sat stunned for what seemed an uncomfortably long time. They shifted in their seats, leafed through copies of Utusan Malaysia, and fiddled with their mobile devices. They certainly greeted Khairy with a standing ovation at the end of his speech, but it was unclear whether they even understood what he was really talking about. Indeed, during the debate of his speech, many Youth delegates resorted to the same old rhetoric of patronage and did not even address Khairy’s call to ditch ketuanan Melayu.

But it was a moment nonetheless — watching an Umno leader take on the very ideology that fuels the party’s grassroots. It might have even been the miracle many Malaysians were waiting for if not for the other two addresses delivered on the same day.

Rhetoric vs results

Newly-minted Wanita chief Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil also decided to up the ante with her address. She said that Wanita’s three urgent priorities were:

bulletpointEnsuring women received justice under Islamic Family Law. Shahrizat, however, did not challenge the substance of the legislation, merely its application in the syariah courts. She talked about the importance of looking after Muslim women’s welfare in cases of divorce, child support and maintenance.

bulletpointEmpowering women economically. Instead of going on a spiel that blamed women for their lack of economic empowerment, Shahrizat identified a few core barriers to women’s participation in the workforce, for example, that so few employers offer childcare support for working women.

bulletpointIncreasing women’s access to leadership. Here, Shahrizat hoped that the abolition of the party’s quota system would allow for women’s delegates to have more direct access to leadership even at the grassroots level.

shahrizat

In many ways, Shahrizat’s speech was even better than Khairy’s. She had numbers and figures to back her claims. She identified problems and issues. She provided solutions.

But perhaps Shahrizat needs to be evaluated against higher standards than Khairy. She is a former and current Women, Family and Community Development Minister. She should already know these issues like the back of her hand, and in fact she should have tried to solve them a long time ago. That she needs to raise them as Wanita chief again is actually problematic — does Shahrizat merely deliver on rhetoric, and not on actual results?

Smorgasbord of ketuanan rhetoric

Even so, Shahrizat’s address shone with promise compared to that given by newly-elected Puteri Umno chief, Datuk Rosnah Abdul Rashid Shirlin. To be fair, Rosnah tried to cover an ambitious amount of ground in her maiden policy speech. She had ideas on school education, facilities, urban poverty, language, foreign domestic workers and yes, even Islam. But if Rosnah’s ideas on reform in these areas catch on in Puteri Umno, then multiracial Malaysia will have a problem.

Rosnah wants the national language to be called "Bahasa Melayu", not "Bahasa Malaysia". After all, she says, why call it "Bahasa Malaysia" when only Malay Malaysians speak the language anyway while all the other races only want to defend their own native languages? She is also aghast at how much Malaysia is conceding to the demands made by Indonesian domestic workers. Why legislate a day off for them? Why raise their wages? They only run away, fall in love, and get pregnant out of wedlock anyway. Get workers from Cambodia instead, she says.

Rosnah

That Rosnah talks about all of this as part of her "reform" package is worrying. Her address, unlike Shahrizat’s and Khairy’s, uses the phrase "ketuanan Melayu" quite liberally. Perhaps what is even more worrying is that today’s Puteri leaders are tomorrow’s Wanita leaders. At least the problem with Shahrizat now is that she spouts beautiful rhetoric but does not deliver in substance. Imagine the kind of problems the party, and the public, will likely have with Shahrizat’s heir.

And so, with the conclusion of the Youth, Wanita and Puteri assemblies today, the country may still not witness a giant leap for Umno. Khairy stuck his neck out, Shahrizat repeated a description of ongoing issues, and Rosnah merely regurgitated supremacist rhetoric.

If anything, however, it will be interesting to observe longer-term reactions towards Khairy’s address. After all, it is Umno Youth that has often occupied the headlines for its defensive and exclusivist rhetoric in the past. Can Khairy single-handedly drag Umno Youth, and by extension Wanita and Puteri, into a new way of thinking and doing politics? Good thing he laid out his vision on public record — now, not only Umno Youth, but the entire country, can hold him accountable to this vision.

Source: http://thenutgraph.com/article-4923.html

Afghan Women’s Freedom In Jeopardy

Oct. 14, 2009

The Road Ahead: Lara Logan Reports on One Group that Absolutely Dreads a Taliban Resurgence

(CBS) For Afghan women, the fall of the Taliban brought historic change, CBS News Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Lara Logan reports. More than two million girls are now in school. Some women are able to work – even in the most public of jobs.

Others can now enjoy the simple feminine pleasures they were denied. In the cities, a growing number of women cover only their heads – instead of their whole bodies. All of this would have been unthinkable under the Taliban.

CBS News Special Report: The Road Ahead

"Women couldn’t move out of their houses, couldn’t move around freely, and alone," said Dr. Massouda Jalal.

Jalal was jailed by the Taliban for her work helping women and children. She remembers their cruelty – women being publicly executed during the height of Taliban power.

After their defeat, Jalal became a symbol of how much had changed for Afghan women. In 2004, she was the first woman to run for president, finishing well ahead of most male candidates.

She was appointed Minister of Women’s Affairs – then removed for pushing too aggressively for women’s rights.

"We have provisions protecting women’s rights and promoting women’s rights within the constitution," said Jalal. "But, it’s not translated into action."

Female prisoners in Kabul today seem to have no rights at all.

Kamela, is just 29 years old. A mother of two, she left her life in Canada to return to her homeland when the Taliban fell. All it took to put her behind bars for 3 years was her husband’s word – he accused her of stealing from him.

"After I was imprisoned he got married to another woman," she says, "I think he wanted to get married so he put me here."

Even more disturbing: violent attacks against women and girls continue today.

Atifa Bibi lies in a hospital, her face badly burned. She and a friend were victims of an acid attack late last year as they walked to school.

Her wounds have healed – but she no longer goes to school. She told us she has nightmares almost every night.

"It cannot go away, every minute, it is with me," she said.

Rates of violence against Afghan women are among the highest in the world.

So is the maternal mortality rate. Three years ago we traveled to the remote province of Badakhshan because it has the highest maternal mortality rate ever recorded – that remains true today. 6,500 deaths per 100,000 births, compared to just 13 deaths per 100,000 in the United States.

The medical staff told us most of the women here are forbidden by their husbands from coming to this clinic or from seeing male doctors.

In spite of these barriers, there has been progress. The number of Afghan women with access to newly built clinics has risen in recent years. But so has the influence of the Taliban. As the fight for control of this country intensifies, the small, fragile gains achieved by women and their most basic human rights – are threatened.

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/14/eveningnews/main5384796.shtml

URL: http://newageislam.net/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=1926

Mecca super-hotel to offer spa, butler and a chocolate room